Despite all the issues people have had with No Man's Sky, I've found it to work fairly well, and scales well down to the 940m. I ran the game on both my Asus UX303LB with GT 940m GPU and also on my Clevo P650SE with 970m and it ran very playable on both.
940m had to run at 1280x720 low details and ended up with about 20-25 FPS on the ground, 40 FPS indoors, and 30-40 FPS in space. There were definitely hitches and glitches along the way but still playable. GPU did get to 90C and with overclock it helped FPS slightly, but then it started to thermal throttle.
970m ran at 1920x1080 medium details and ended up with about 50 FPS on the ground, and about 70 FPS indoors, and 50-60 FPS in space. GPU did not exceed 67C.
I turned off frame cap and vsync, otherwise I didn't have to do anything special. It also runs like sauce on my desktop 980 Ti.
See these videos showing performance. Ignore my horrible gameplay. I still can't control the spaceship worth a damn with mouse and keyboard.
Skip to 2:22 in 940m video to bypass my blabbering about details of the laptop:
For 970m skip to 3:20 to get to the gameplay and FPS performance.
No Man's Sky...
Aucun commentaire:
Enregistrer un commentaire